近期,由于 Opera 在欧盟状告微软于操作系统内捆绑其 IE 浏览器,引起了大家关于 W3C 制定标准的效率和可行性的质疑。下面列出对此问题分析得较为全面、透彻且具有指导性意义的几篇文章。其中第二篇文章的作者 Andy Clarke 也是 Transcending CSS - the fine art of web design 这本书的作者。

  • The B-List: The future of web standards

    One of the major issues in resolving this problem is that huge amounts of discussion have essentially assumed a false dilemma, that there are only two ways to run a standards body:

    A closed-door, pay-to-play system, as the W3C is perceived to be.
    A howling mob which runs by consensus of the participants.

    Finding the balance
    This brings us to a new question: how do we find the proper balance between the competing interests of Web vendors and Web users/developers?

    Microsoft is pinned; they’re stuck trying to catch up to what everybody else is already doing, while the competition just keeps piling on new features and new technologies. They’re not dead yet, of course, and are far from it: IE is still the dominant browser and Windows is still the dominant operating system. But there’s definitely been a sea change in the industry: Microsoft, the unstoppable juggernaut, is vulnerable and is having to play catch-up to maintain its dominance. To borrow a phrase from Lewis Carroll, they’re having to run as fast as they can, just to stay where they are.

    And so Microsoft really isn’t relevant to the future of web standards; any compelling new development that comes from the rest of the industry will be just another form of fire and motion, and Microsoft will have no choice but to keep pace, regardless of whether they participated in the process.

  • CSS Unworking Group | Malarkey Rides Again

    Along with web designers worldwide, I have been creatively stifled by Microsoft’s decision to allow Internet Explorer 6 for Windows to languish in the doldrums for so many years. With their significant market-share, Microsoft should have been at the forefront of technical development and standards support in browsers. That would have fostered an ever increasing focus on what can be possible using CSS. Instead Microsoft allowed their lead to hinder progress and web designers, developers, their clients and their customers have all suffered as a result.

  • JeffCroft.com: Do we need a return to the browser wars?
  • as days pass by, by Stuart Langridge - Reigniting the browser wars
Posted in Design at January 10th, 2008. No Comments.

微软于昨天推出了其称为Surface的产品,该产品乍一看会让人以为是一张桌子+触摸敏感显示屏+底层操作系统。然而实际上是用5个隐藏式摄像头捕捉用户动作的。产品本身根本无任何创新理念及技术含量。Surface与iPhone之差别,就好如玩具火车和航天飞机的差别。如此骗人之产品竟敢漫天要价5千到1万美元。Verizon居然傻到打算将这样的产品用于其零售店内。微软似乎总是能大势吹嘘他们如何如何能带来先进的技术、出色的用户体验…然后就开始大口吸用户的血了。可能有人会说好的设计应受到重视,但微软设计了什么?IE,一个易受流氓软件感染、对Web标准支持问题迟迟未受微软重视而没能得以完善的浏览器;Windows,一个源于对Apple早期操作系统抄袭、易被间谍软件、广告软件、病毒侵染、将许多简单问题复杂化以使其显得高深莫测的操作系统…

Now compare Surface. Microsoft says it’s been working on it since 2001; that’s six years of development. With what result? It’s not small like the iPhone. It doesn’t have a specific user interface. It appears to be built out of spare parts From Ikea. Why was Surface in development so long, and what does it really offer?

In reality, Surface isn’t a giant touch screen system. It’s a frosted acrylic light table. Like everything else Microsoft has pushed out, its also a Windows PC. There’s no touch screen involved at all.Instead, the system uses a series of five video cameras hidden inside the bathtub base. The PC it uses, like most PCs, has support for yesteryear’s 802.11g wireless networking and Bluetooth, as well as the ho-hum 10/100 Ethernet I criticized Apple for using in the new AirPort Extreme and in Apple TV. At least they both offer wireless-n.

Read More…

Posted in Myth at June 1st, 2007. No Comments.